Injunction Lawyer Toronto · Ontario Bar · 15+ Years

Injunction Lawyer in Toronto

Some harm cannot be undone with money after the fact. When you need a court to stop something from happening — right now — Legal Solutions Law Firm brings urgent injunction motions in the Ontario Superior Court, often within days, to protect clients from irreparable harm.

15+ Years at the Ontario Bar
500+ Civil Matters Handled
24/7 Available
Free Consultation
🛑
500+
Civil Matters Handled
🏛️500+Civil Matters Handled
🎯15+Years at the Ontario Bar
💬FlexiblePayment Plans Available
💼$0Consultation Fee

Why Choose Legal Solutions

Toronto's Trusted Injunction Counsel

True Emergency Availability

We are available 24/7 for genuinely urgent matters, and can bring emergency motions on short notice when circumstances demand it.

⚖️

RJR-MacDonald Test Expertise

We build injunction motions around the three-part legal test Ontario courts apply, giving your application the strongest possible foundation.

🔒

Asset Freezing & Preservation Orders

We pursue Mareva injunctions and other preservation orders where a party may otherwise move or dissipate assets to defeat your claim.

💼

Business & Personal Injunctions

We seek and defend against injunctions in business, contractual, property, and personal disputes across Toronto and the GTA.

Overview

What Is an Injunction?

An injunction is a court order requiring a party to do something (a "mandatory" injunction) or, far more commonly, to stop doing something (a "prohibitory" injunction). Unlike most civil remedies, which compensate a party after harm has occurred, an injunction is designed to prevent harm before it happens, or to stop ongoing harm immediately — which is why injunctions are among the most urgent and time-sensitive remedies available in Ontario civil litigation.

Ontario recognizes several types of injunctions, distinguished mainly by their duration and the stage of proceedings at which they are granted. An interim injunction is a very short-term order, sometimes granted without notice to the other side (ex parte) in genuinely urgent circumstances, lasting only until a proper hearing can be held. An interlocutory injunction is granted after a hearing (though generally still before a full trial) and remains in effect until the underlying dispute is finally resolved. A permanent injunction is granted as part of the final judgment in a case, after the merits of the dispute have been fully determined at trial.

Ontario courts apply a well-established three-part test (from the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in RJR-MacDonald) to decide whether to grant an interim or interlocutory injunction: first, whether there is a serious issue to be tried (a relatively low threshold, though certain injunctions require a stronger prima facie case); second, whether the applicant will suffer irreparable harm — harm that cannot be adequately compensated by money — if the injunction is not granted; and third, whether the balance of convenience favours granting the injunction, weighing the harm to the applicant against the harm an injunction would cause the other party.

Because injunctions are an extraordinary remedy, courts do not grant them lightly, and an applicant seeking an injunction (particularly on an urgent, without-notice basis) is generally required to give an undertaking to compensate the other party for any harm caused by the injunction if it is later found to have been wrongly granted. Preparing a strong injunction motion — with clear evidence of irreparable harm and a properly supported legal basis — is essential, since courts scrutinize these applications carefully given how significant their effect can be.

Quick Definition: Injunction

An injunction is a court order requiring a party to do, or to stop doing, a specific act. Ontario courts assess whether to grant one using a three-part test: whether there is a serious issue to be tried, whether the applicant would suffer irreparable harm without it, and whether the balance of convenience favours granting it.

The Legal Framework

How the Law Works: Types of Injunctions and When They Apply

Interim, Interlocutory, and Permanent Injunctions

The type of injunction available depends on timing and urgency. An interim injunction addresses immediate emergencies and can, in truly urgent cases, be granted without notice to the other party — though the applicant must fully and fairly disclose all relevant facts, including facts unfavourable to their position, given the other side has not had an opportunity to respond. An interlocutory injunction follows a proper (though expedited) hearing with both sides represented, and remains in place while the underlying litigation proceeds. A permanent injunction is granted only after the full merits of a case have been decided, typically at trial.

Mareva Injunctions (Asset Freezing Orders)

A Mareva injunction is a specialized order freezing a defendant's assets to prevent them from being moved, hidden, or dissipated before a judgment can be obtained and enforced. Because a Mareva injunction can seriously disrupt a defendant's affairs, courts apply a demanding standard: the applicant must show a strong prima facie case, that the defendant has assets within the jurisdiction, and a real risk that those assets will be removed or dissipated to defeat a future judgment. These orders are typically sought where a defendant's conduct — such as an unexplained pattern of asset transfers — suggests they may be preparing to become judgment-proof.

Anton Piller Orders

An Anton Piller order is an extraordinary civil search order, allowing a plaintiff (accompanied by an independent supervising lawyer) to enter a defendant's premises and search for and preserve evidence that might otherwise be destroyed — most commonly used in cases involving alleged theft of intellectual property, trade secrets, or confidential business information. Courts grant these orders only in the clearest cases, given how significant an intrusion they represent, and require an extremely strong evidentiary basis before doing so.

Undertakings and the Cost of Being Wrong

A party seeking an interim or interlocutory injunction is almost always required to provide an undertaking to the court — a formal promise to compensate the other party for losses caused by the injunction if it later turns out the injunction should not have been granted. This means seeking an injunction carries real risk: if your underlying claim ultimately fails, you may be liable for the harm the injunction caused the other side while it was in effect. This is one of many reasons injunction motions require careful, honest strategic assessment before they are brought.

What We See

Common Injunction Applications We Handle

Our Toronto injunction practice acts in urgent matters including:

🔒Breach of Non-Compete or Confidentiality Clauses
🏗️Stopping Construction or Property Encroachment
💰Freezing Assets (Mareva Injunctions)
📄Enforcing Restrictive Covenants
🏢Commercial Lease & Landlord Disputes
🤝Shareholder & Partnership Emergency Relief
💻Protecting Confidential Information & Trade Secrets
🏠Real Estate Transaction Disputes
⚠️Preventing Dissipation of Business Assets
🛡️Defending Against Injunction Applications

Timing Matters

When You Should Contact an Injunction Lawyer

Injunctions are inherently time-sensitive — courts expect applicants to act promptly once harm becomes apparent. Contact us immediately if:

A former employee or business partner is misusing confidential information or breaching a non-compete agreement right now.
A party is about to take an action — selling an asset, breaching a restrictive covenant, proceeding with construction — that will cause harm that cannot be undone.
You believe a debtor or defendant is moving or hiding assets to avoid a future judgment against them.
A dispute involves unique property or a one-of-a-kind asset where monetary damages alone would not be an adequate remedy.
You have been served with an injunction application and need to respond urgently to protect your position.
Ongoing harm to your business or property requires immediate court intervention, not a conventional lawsuit timeline.

Our Process

The Step-by-Step Legal Process

01

Immediate Consultation

We assess the urgency and merits of your situation immediately — injunction matters often cannot wait for a scheduled appointment.

02

Evidence Assembly

We move quickly to assemble the affidavit evidence needed to establish irreparable harm and the other elements of the injunction test.

03

Motion Preparation & Filing

We prepare and file the motion, seeking the shortest available hearing timeline given the genuine urgency involved.

04

Hearing

We argue the motion before the court, addressing the serious issue, irreparable harm, and balance of convenience directly.

05

Ongoing Litigation

Where an injunction is granted, we continue the underlying action toward a final resolution, whether by settlement or trial.

Realistic Expectations

Possible Outcomes

Injunction motions are decided relatively quickly compared to a full trial, and courts weigh the evidence carefully given the significance of the remedy. Realistic outcomes include:

Best Case
Injunction Granted
The court grants the requested order, stopping the harmful conduct immediately while the underlying dispute proceeds.
Common
Resolution Without a Full Hearing
The other party agrees to stop the conduct once served with the motion, avoiding the need for a contested hearing.
Partial
Modified Injunction
The court grants a narrower order than requested, balancing the interests of both parties differently than originally sought.
Defensive
Motion Dismissed
Where defending against an injunction application, the court declines to grant it because the legal test is not satisfied.
Conditional
Injunction With Undertaking
The injunction is granted, but the applicant must post security or accept conditions protecting the other side if the claim later fails.

Fees & Costs

Costs and Legal Fees

Injunction motions require intensive, compressed work given their urgency, which affects cost. We are direct about likely fees given the time-sensitive nature of these applications.

Emergency Consultation
Immediate assessment of your situation and whether an injunction is realistically available on your facts.
Motion Preparation
Costs for preparing the affidavit evidence and legal argument needed to support an urgent injunction motion.
Hearing Costs
Representation at the injunction hearing itself, which may be scheduled on an expedited basis given the urgency involved.
Underlying Litigation
An injunction is generally part of a larger lawsuit — ongoing litigation costs continue after the injunction is decided.
Cost Recovery & Exposure
A successful applicant may recover costs; an unsuccessful one may be liable for the other side's costs and any undertaking given.

Got Questions?

Frequently Asked Questions

Avoid These

Common Mistakes in Injunction Matters

Waiting to see how the situation develops
Courts expect applicants to act promptly once harm becomes apparent — delay can itself be used to argue the harm is not actually urgent.
Treating an injunction as just a pressure tactic
Bringing a weak injunction motion primarily for leverage can backfire, exposing you to costs and liability under your own undertaking if it fails.
Providing incomplete disclosure on an ex parte motion
Failing to disclose unfavourable facts on a without-notice application can result in the injunction being set aside once the other side responds.
Underestimating the undertaking as to damages
Applicants sometimes do not appreciate that they can be personally liable for the other side's losses if the injunction is later found to be wrongly granted.
Assuming any financial loss qualifies as irreparable harm
Losses that can be compensated by money later generally do not meet the irreparable harm threshold, regardless of how significant they feel.
Ignoring a served injunction motion
Failing to respond promptly and with proper evidence can result in an order being granted without your side of the story being heard.

Getting Started

Documents to Gather Before Your Consultation

Given the urgency of injunction matters, bringing the following immediately helps us act quickly on your behalf:

📄Any contract, agreement, or restrictive covenant relevant to the situation
📄Evidence of the harm occurring or about to occur — documents, screenshots, or communications
📄Any correspondence with the other party about the issue
📄Evidence of the other party's assets or conduct, if seeking to freeze assets or prevent dissipation
📄A clear, detailed timeline of events, with specific dates
📄Contact information for any witnesses who can speak to the urgency or harm involved
📄Any injunction application already served on you, if you are responding to one

Our Role

How Legal Solutions Can Help

Legal Solutions Law Firm brings and defends against injunction applications in the Ontario Superior Court, for individuals and businesses facing genuinely urgent harm across Toronto and the GTA. We understand that injunction matters cannot wait for a routine scheduling process, and we act accordingly — assembling evidence, drafting motion materials, and appearing in court on compressed timelines when the situation demands it.

Before recommending an injunction, we assess honestly whether your circumstances meet the demanding legal test Ontario courts apply, including whether the harm you face is genuinely irreparable and whether the balance of convenience realistically favours the relief you are seeking. Bringing a weak motion wastes time and resources and can expose you to liability under the undertaking required of most applicants.

Where an injunction is warranted, we move as quickly as the court process allows to secure it — including seeking urgent, even same-day relief in the clearest emergencies. We also represent clients on the receiving end of injunction applications, building a proper evidentiary response to protect their position.

An injunction is rarely the end of a dispute on its own — it is typically part of a broader lawsuit. We carry every injunction matter forward through the underlying litigation toward a final, lasting resolution.

Tools & Guides

Wondering how long it takes to get a matter before the court, or what an urgent motion might cost? These free guides can help:

Our Reach

Serving Every Toronto Neighbourhood

Downtown CoreNorth YorkScarboroughEtobicokeEast YorkYorkThe BeachesYorkville

From My Experience: Injunctions Reward Speed and Preparation in Equal Measure

The clients who get injunctions granted are almost always the ones who called me the same day something happened, not two weeks later after trying to handle it themselves. Courts are genuinely skeptical of urgency claims from applicants who sat on the problem for a while before acting — and honestly, that skepticism is fair. If something is truly causing irreparable harm right now, the evidence of that should look like you treated it that way from the start.

At the same time, speed without preparation doesn't work either. An injunction motion built on a thin affidavit, without clear evidence of irreparable harm, gets picked apart in court — and a failed motion can leave you worse off than if you'd never brought it, both in cost and in how the judge views your underlying case going forward. The real skill in this area is doing both at once: moving fast while still building a legally solid application.

On Irreparable Harm

This is where I see the most confusion. Clients often come to me convinced their situation is an emergency because the financial stakes are high — and high stakes alone doesn't get you an injunction if the harm can eventually be fixed with money. The strongest injunction cases I've run involve something that genuinely cannot be undone: confidential information that's already out once disclosed, a unique property about to be sold to someone else, a business relationship that will be permanently destroyed if we don't act now. Understanding that distinction early saves clients from chasing a remedy that was never realistically available.

On the Undertaking

I make sure every client understands the undertaking as to damages before we file anything — you are essentially promising the court that if you turn out to be wrong, you will personally compensate the other side for the harm the injunction caused them. This isn't meant to discourage genuinely urgent applications. It's meant to make sure clients go in with clear eyes about what they're signing up for, not just the upside of getting the order granted.

If something urgent is happening right now — call us immediately, day or night, at 416-274-2222. We are available 24/7, and the first consultation is free.

Injunction Lawyer? We Can Help.

Get an honest assessment of your matter and a clear strategy — starting with a free, no-obligation consultation.

Free Consultation

Speak With an Injunction Lawyer Today

Available 24/7 for urgent matters. Call or text 416-274-2222 immediately — do not wait if something irreversible is about to happen.

✓ Free 30 Minute Consultation✓ Flat Fees & Payment Plans Available✓ Emergency Appointments Available